Sujet : Re: MAstodon setup disaster
De : nunojsilva (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Nuno Silva)
Groupes : comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc comp.os.linux.miscDate : 19. Mar 2025, 12:12:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vre8r3$n0k3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
On 2025-03-19, Eli the Bearded wrote:
In comp.os.linux.misc, The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
All right I have attempt to set up Mastodon in
Debian 12 (snap included)
Ubuntu 24 (snap included)
FreeBSD based on https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/net-im/mastodon
>
Mastodon seems a bear to run. Have you considered the lightweight snac2?
>
https://codeberg.org/grunfink/snac2
>
I'm paying masto.host for an instance, but would be tempted to switch to
snac2 if it suppported account migrations (which, alas, it does not:
"simple, minimalistic" implementations are not full featured).
It looks like not even Mastodon fully supports migrations:
https://erinkissane.com/notes-from-a-mastodon-migrationI find it especially concerning that using the migration feature breaks
lists...
While I still have to decide how to do it, I'm changing to a different
instance, and so far it looks like it might be better to keep both
accounts active without migrating.
But Mastodon has more urgent issues, like making the official web UI
more usable instead of trying to clone TSNFKAT :-P
I might switch my bot account over to a snac2 instance, as I don't care
much about history there. Currently I'm using an even lighter weight
activitypub framework, activity-bot. My fork:
>
https://codeberg.org/elithebearded/activity-bot
>
Elijah
------
if you are installing via snap you might not like complex installs
-- Nuno Silva(not following comp.unix.bsd.freebsd)