Sujet : Re: HHH(DD) --- COMPUTE ACTUAL MAPPING FROM INPUT TO OUTPUT --- Using Finite String Transformations
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 17. Apr 2025, 12:49:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <vtqpt5$17ns$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
olcott <
polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/16/2025 1:09 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:29:18 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote:
The question is whether a universal termination analyser can be
constructed, and the answer is that it can't.
Aren't you kind of putting the cart before the horse with such an
assertion? Maybe the prior art you are basing that assertion on is wrong?
You're speaking from ignorance of mathematics. The halting problem has
been unequivocally proven. It is a simple theorem, only slightly more
complicated than 2 + 2 = 4.
We're not talking about "prior art", or anything like that. We're
talking rigorous mathematics. We're talking about absolute truth,
something that Peter Olcott does not understand. You don't need to join
him.
/Flibble
Moronically stupid "rigorous mathematics" that is far
too stupid to know that unless the finite string input
input is transformed by finite string transformation
operations into outputs that you are doing the computer
science stupidly incorrectly.
That isn't even a well formed sentence.
All of logic, reasoning and computation boils down to
finite string transformations on inputs deriving outputs.
That's a big assertion, one you have not proved. It is one you can't
prove, even were it true, since you don't understand the concept of
proof.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
-- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).