Sujet : Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 03. Apr 2025, 10:58:04
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <wLmdnYQoKJMzxnP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 4/3/25 4:00 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
rbowman wrote:
fwiw upgrading my Fedora box from 41 to the 42 pre-releae KDE Plasma
version for Fedora Test Days went well.
After upgrading to 41 I noticed my fedora box had some rawhide packages installed (presumably I'm responsible, but I haven't wanted to use it for about a decade, so disabled repos)
It still runs fine, but I'm expecting the upgrade to 42 to be "interesting"
41 is "good". Hopefully 42 will be equally good - but,
these days, it's maybe better to wait for a .1 release -
they tend to launch a tad TOO soon of late. BookWorm
was the same way - indeed seemed DEDICATED to making
sure the stuff I used most wouldn't work :-) Also way
too 'Buntu ... who the hell did they hire ??? Deb is
supposed to be 'core', 'the foundation', boring but
super solid/consistent.
Fedora 42 pre-releae
Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae