Re: The joy of Linux

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: The joy of Linux
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 10. Nov 2024, 08:08:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <z76cnW_bz8R9xq36nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 11/9/24 9:38 PM, rbowman wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 20:37:02 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
 
I'd love a '69 Falcon with the 200
    six ... had one long long ago. Super-simple, a tank, you could kinda
    literally climb into the hood to get at the parts, adequate
    performance,
    didn't report your every move to the company. Could maybe add a
    little selected 'smartness' with a PI ....
 I had a '62 2 door Falcon Futura Sports Sedan white with a black vinyl
top. It looked like a shrunken T-Bird and thought it was a Jeep. One
Christmas holiday I was at my cousin's in NJ when a blizzard hit so bad
the NYS Thruway was closed. The Taconic Parkway was open so I took that.
My mother whined all the way but we made it to Troy. The 170 was no fire
breather but it kept on going.
   I had a friend with a couple of old Mercs - a 61 and 64 if I
   recall correctly. Both under 200ci. The older one only had
   a TWO-speed tranny. Again, not fire-breathers by any measure,
   but they WERE tanks and you COULD get at all the relevant parts.
   By the early 70s the quality of American cars suddenly went
   down the tubes. Japanese competition was rising so they decided
   to cut costs. NOT good.

It was diametrically opposed to my '62 Continental if you want to talk
about tanks. 5400 lbs at the curb with a 430 engine. It had a fondness for
fuel pumps and the forward opening hood made for a miserable experience.
They should have done it like the Triumph Spitfire where the whole front
end swung up and you could it on a tire while working on it.
   Well, THAT would be TOO EASY for the consumer !  :-)
   As for Falcons ... the model line DID persist for a very
   long time in Australia. There was one local maker though
   who made a "better Falcon", heavier suspension intended
   to cope with the rough Aussie roads.
   Anyway, those older cars CAN be had - in various stages
   of repair/re-do. The prices ain't THAT bad. My only
   concern would be PARTS - though you'd think 3-D printers
   could create most anything these days.
   Looks like 1983 was the last year of the traditional
   inline-six alas - from Chrysler corp. Good engines
   all in all, just enough and simple. Never quite GOT
   the Slant-6 ... WHY they slanted it .....

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Oct 24 * Re: The joy of FORTRAN233186282@ud0s4.net
4 Oct 24 +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN231Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN230186282@ud0s4.net
4 Oct 24 i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN227Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN226rbowman
4 Oct 24 i i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN225Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN219rbowman
5 Oct 24 i i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN218Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Oct 24 i i  i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN217186282@ud0s4.net
6 Oct 24 i i  i  +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24 i i  i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN214rbowman
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN213186282@ud0s4.net
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i +* Re: The joy of FORTH211Peter Dean
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i i+* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i ii`- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Peter Dean
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)208Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)207rbowman
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)199Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)198rbowman
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)197Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)196John Ames
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i   `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)195Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)187John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)186Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)185rbowman
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)184Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2rbowman
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   i`- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)181John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i    `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)180Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)151John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)150Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)149John Ames
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)147magardner2010
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  i+* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)144Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)143magardner2010
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)142Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)139186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i`* Re: The joy of Ada138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i `* Re: The joy of Ada137186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i  `* Re: The joy of Ada136Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i   `* Re: The joy of Ada135186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    +* Re: The joy of Ada132rbowman
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i+* Re: The joy of SQL19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii`* Re: The joy of SQL18186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii +* Re: The joy of SQL4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i`* Re: The joy of SQL3rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i `* Re: The joy of SQL2Peter Dean
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1Peter Dean
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii +* Re: The joy of SQL5rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i+- Re: The joy of SQL1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i`* Re: The joy of SQL3John Ames
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i `* Re: The joy of SQL2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1Kerr-Mudd, John
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii `* Re: The joy of SQL8The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii  `* Re: The joy of SQL7Lars Poulsen
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   +* Re: The joy of SQL4Waldek Hebisch
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i`* Re: The joy of SQL3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i `* Re: The joy of SQL2rbowman
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1John Levine
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   `* Re: The joy of SQL2The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii    `- Re: The joy of SQL1rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i+- Re: The joy of Ada1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i`* Re: The joy of Ada111The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i +- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i `* Re: The joy of Ada109The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i  +- Re: The joy of Ada1rbowman
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i  `* Re: The joy of Ada107Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i   `* Re: The joy of Ada106186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i    `* Re: The joy of Ada105Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     +* Re: The joy of Linux80Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     i+* Re: The joy of Linux78Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii+* Re: The joy of Linux3rbowman
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     iii`* Re: The joy of Linux2186282@ud0s4.net
31 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     iii `- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii`* Re: The joy of Linux74Lars Poulsen
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii +- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii `* Re: The joy of Linux72The Natural Philosopher
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  +* Re: The joy of Linux3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  i`* Re: The joy of Linux2186282@ud0s4.net
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  i `- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  `* Re: The joy of Linux68John Ames
5 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii   `* Re: The joy of Linux67The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii    `* Re: The joy of Linux66186282@ud0s4.net
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     +* Re: The joy of Linux27The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     i+* Re: The joy of Linux25rbowman
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii+* Re: The joy of Linux9The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii+* Re: The joy of Linux6rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii`* Re: The joy of Linux5The Natural Philosopher
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii `* OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]4Robert Riches
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii  `* Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]3The Natural Philosopher
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii   `* Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]2Rich
9 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii    `- Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]1The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii`* Re: The joy of Linux2D
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii `- Re: The joy of Linux1The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii`* Re: The joy of Linux15D
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii +* Re: The joy of Linux2Chris Ahlstrom
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i`- Re: The joy of Linux1The Natural Philosopher
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii +* Re: The joy of Linux9rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i`* Re: The joy of Linux8The Natural Philosopher
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i `* Re: The joy of Linux7rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii `* Re: The joy of Linux3The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     i`- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     `* Re: The joy of Linux38Rich
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     i`- Re: The joy of Linux1186282@ud0s4.net
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     +- Re: The joy of Ada1186282@ud0s4.net
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     `* Re: The joy of Ada23186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    `* Re: The joy of Ada2186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  `* Re: The joy of strong typing2magardner2010
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2Peter Flass
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  `- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Jim Jackson
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)28Peter Flass
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    +- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1rbowman
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)6Waldek Hebisch
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  +- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Peter Dean
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)6Marc Olschok
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
7 Oct 24 i i  i  `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
5 Oct 24 i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Richard Kettlewell
4 Oct 24 i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
4 Oct 24 `- Re: python abstractions, The joy of FORTRAN1John Levine

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal