Re: (Almost) Rock-n-Roll - "The Bunny Hop" (1953)

On 1/9/25 11:02 AM, Allodoxaphobia wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 02:48:19 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch%v=EmC1KyxhEJU
>
Sax and trumpet main, not guitars.

 And, this has what, please, to do with colm?

   Actually it was mis-posted ...
   But it's still fun.
   Set it as yer KDE startup tune  :-)
   Hmmm ... wonder if it's where Hugh Hefner got
   his 'bunny' idea ?

The trash overflows in this ng.
Time to rename it  --  and for me to drop it.

   I've complained from time to time, tried to start
   lin-centric threads ... only just SO much good.
   People are people and 'linux' is a kinda narrow
   subject - so other stuff quickly creeps in.
   The tech stuff - usually in the first half dozen
   replies in the thread.
   Maybe you should get a Chat or OpenAI feed and
   order it to stick to the hard tech and only the
   hard tech ? Of course soon even those will rebel
   and drift and wanna talk about the Kardashians.
   On the plus, most all people in COLM are gonna
   have 3-digit IQs - unlike too many other groups  :-)
   If you want tech ... I've been trying to find out
   if with modern 'flat address space' CPUs there's
   any speed advantage in setting functions and
   data blocks at specific addresses - what in the
   old days would have been 'page boundaries' or
   such. In short does an i7 or ARM and/or popular
   mem-management chips have less work to do setting
   up reading/writing at some memory addresses ?
   Maybe a critical app could run ten percent faster
   if, even 'wasting' memory, you put some stuff in
   kind of exact places. Older chips with banked
   memory and even mag HDDs, the answer was Yes.