Sujet : Re: I never thought of this scenario
De : mh+usenetspam1118 (at) *nospam* zugschl.us (Marc Haber)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 19. Apr 2024, 06:26:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details
Message-ID : <uvsv9e$3de5$1@news1.tnib.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 20:15:32 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
>
.. when a DHCP client /renews/ it's lease,
it has a valid IP address and can use that to talk to the DHCP server on
a remote subnet using standard DHCP protocol.
>
Why would it need to? The DHCP server is on the same subnet, otherwise the
client could not have got that address in the first place.
For the unmpteenth time: You don't know enough about DHCP to be a
member of a fruitful discussion about that protocol.
The fact that YOUR DHCP server is on the same subnet of your
residential one-subnet setup does NOT mean that this is the case for
all DHCP deployments.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im HeaderRhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402