Re: Editor of OSNews calls Jew Bryan Lunduke a Nazi...

On 2024-07-28, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

>
>
On Sun, 28 Jul 2024, Borax Man wrote:
>

["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.misc.]
On 2024-07-27, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

Or let hoards of immigrants into your country.  Too late now, for many
formerly white countries, like England.  They are entrenched, and will
out-breed the whites by a margin of 4 to 1.
>
In a few generations England will be a black Muslim country.  Amazing
but true.

>
Sad but true. But I think this extreme mismanagement by politicians and
their plans to replace the white population will backfire in at least one
country leading to a repeat of Hitler, violence etc.

>
I spoke to a Socialist today who had fliers about the rise of the far
right.  I said that you could avoid the "far-right" rising, by offering
an alternative solution to the migrant crisis, or at least, making an
attempt to deal with it.
>
He just said that was ridiculous, there was no problem, and I'm a
"racist" for stating that Europeans actually do see it as a problem.

>
This is the truth and completely in line with what is expected of a
socialist. Europes socialists earn millions on importing voters from
arabia.
>
Without them, thanks to capitalism and conservative values, the working
class of europe would be so well off, that they'd say f*ck you to the
socialists high taxes, so they must constantly build their voter base.
>
The problem is that they are so short sighted and one eyed, and power is
the only thing they see, that they cannot even imagine the arabians
getting together and forming the first muslim parties, and then the
socialists are truly smoked.

Here's another perspective:

In 1974, the racist Garrett Hardin published an article called "Lifeboat
Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor." The article's central
conceit is to depict the wealthy nations of the Earth as overladen
lifeboats, foundering on a sea of chaos: "In the ocean outside each
lifeboat swim the poor of the world, who would like to get in, or at
least to share some of the wealth. What should the lifeboat
passengers do?"

Hardin's answer is naked: he opts, literally and in so many words, for
"population control the crude way." It is more moral to allow billions
of human beings to starve to death, that is, rather than provide them
with food aid. Outside the minutes of the Wannsee Conference, indeed,
the logic behind the engineering of deathworlds has rarely been made so
shamelessly explicit.

Here he is, talking about India--and I warn you, the utterly casual
disregard here is profoundly upsetting: "Every one of the 15 million new
lives added to India's population [annually] puts an additional burden
on the environment, and increases the economic and social costs of
crowding... [E]very Indian life saved through medical or nutritional
assistance from abroad diminishes the quality of life for those who
remain, and for subsequent generations."

There it is, sitting on the page as plain as day, just as Mbembe called
it: an explicit act of rhetorical magick transforming the newly born to
the already dead. In less than 5,000 words, Hardin plainly states three
things whose relevance will become increasingly clear as the Long
Emergency unfolds:

That even after Nuremburg, public intellectuals in the North will not
hesitate to reach for genocide as a tool of policy when it serves their
interests; that what we would now think of as weaponized food insecurity
is to be the means of accomplishing that genocide; and that the putting
to death of entire populations is to be undertaken in notional defense
of the ecosystem, all so that other, more favored populations may
continue to enjoy it into an indefinite, white future.