Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
On 30/07/2024 06:37, Andreas Eder wrote:On Mo 29 Jul 2024 at 21:55, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:On 29/07/2024 13:27, Eric Pozharski wrote:with <v85fdr$3uder$4@dont-email.me> The Natural Philosopher wrote:On 28/07/2024 12:26, Andreas Eder wrote:On So 28 Jul 2024 at 10:54, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:On 28/07/2024 06:44, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:On 7/26/24 8:55 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:On 2024-07-26 3:32 a.m., 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:On 7/24/24 9:30 PM, Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther! wrote:
No they are not. No creative studio runs on anything by Xpress orSuch things a regularly done with Context.That is what everyone else is doing ...I'm pretty much certain, you can win this claim *only* byThiose are not typesetting languages per se.No, not at all. Try TeX / LaTeX or Context. No GUI necessary.Linux isn't, and should not pretend to be, Winders.Well why not? A GUI is essentially if you are doing any sort of
graphical work, even typesetting needs some kind of WYSIWG
interface.
redefining terms.
I know what I mean., A multi page brochure in nice colors with
pictures and text interwoven, is not what you do with TEX. Whjich
is why Quark Xpress and a Macinstosh were de rigeur back in the
nineties
Adobe creative suite.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.