Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc alt.folklore.computersDate : 24. Sep 2024, 22:09:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vcv9qr$3bcrt$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:11:19 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
No mention of ALGOL, the ALGorithmic Language?
There were quite a few Algols. Presumbly you were referring to Algol-60
(so-called because the spec was released in 1960). Before that there was
the “International Algorithmic Language”, IAL or “Algol-58”. And
afterwards came the notorious and controversial Algol-68.
In-between there was something called “Wirth-Hoare Algol” or “Algol-W”.
This is where the record-definition syntax came from that Wirth later
incorporated into Pascal, which spawned several descendants, including
Ada.
Ada is not a dead language, by any means. The current interest in writing
more memory-safe code isn’t just being spearheaded by Rust: Ada was doing
this sort of thing decades ago.