Sujet : Re: Can't Avoid That Shit Rust - Even On Gentoo
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscDate : 25. Sep 2024, 06:44:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <1a2dnei6z8bIPm77nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 9/24/24 3:17 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 02:45:16 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Still have my K&R 'C' book ...
Would hope you have caught up with C99, at least.
Ummm ... STILL mostly stick to the Original Product.
Can't go wrong.
Oh, "network programming" is HARD ...
Not that hard. Some of us do it every day.
Yea, but not so MANY of you in the world ...
It's a relatively rare/important skill.
A pre-threaded bi-di TCP daemon does not require
THAT much code these days, but the routines that
code invokes are *complicated*. Do NOT wanna go
to THAT level.
<https://gitlab.com/ldo/ssl_try_python/>
Wrote a FORTRAN app just a couple of years ago ...
Did you use a suitably recent version of Fortran, namely Fortran 90 at
least? It’s quite a decent language these days.
F77
Adequate for the purpose.
It was a 'decent' language even then. More 'friendly'
now, but be careful how much 'solid'/'simple' you trade
for "friendly".
NOT sure if there are still NATIVE F77 compilers for
Linux. Things like gFortran - just 'C' translators -
may as well just do it in 'C' to begin with.
I *think* there are still native F77 compilers for
Linux - but quick searches don't name them anymore.
Maybe 'flang-16' ... but it's reputed to be missing
some stuff. Good old 8-bit compilers ... Intel 'fixed'
THAT. DO have an old core2-quad box that still runs
8-bit however.