Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : johnl (at) *nospam* taugh.com (John Levine)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc alt.folklore.computersDate : 25. Sep 2024, 18:22:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Taughannock Networks
Message-ID : <vd1gte$bs7$1@gal.iecc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
According to Charlie Gibbs <
cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>:
If you look at Algol, it really spawned the likes of B, C, and Pascal
and so on . Its use of local variables being a key feature. They
completely replaced it.
Somewhat but see below.
At the risk of planting flame bait <nudge, nudge>, here in North
America Algol was generally considered the domain of computer
science weenies, while FORTRAN and COBOL were used for applications
in the Real World [tm] (science/engineering and business, respectively).
That was certainly my experience.
COBOL was really a standalone thing. You might say SQL owes it some homage.
>
So does PL/I (or is it PL/1 this week?), which allowed data structures
to be declared COBOL-style.
C's data structures came from COBOL via PL/I. COBOL had (has) very powerful
data structures but weak control structures.
-- Regards,John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly