Re: The joy of FORTRAN

Charlie Gibbs wrote:

On 2024-09-27, Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> wrote:

>

On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:06:36 +0000, rbowman wrote:
>

On 25 Sep 2024 06:52:08 GMT, Bob Eager wrote:
>

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 23:45:51 +0000, rbowman wrote:
>

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 21:14:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>

PL/I was IBM’s attempt at a Grand Unification of both “business” and
“scientific” programming in one language. If you thought C++
programming was full of surprises when your program did unexpected
things, PL/I invented the whole genre of “surprise-ridden programming
language”

>
IBM was always so modest. Programming Language One. A Programming
Language.

>
A colleague of mine wrote a powerful macro processor (which I still use
and maintain). He called it Macro Language One - ML/I. He loved taking
the piss out of IBM.

>
Gary Kildall may have been doing that with PL/M, Programming Language
for Microprocessors. It did have some PL/I DNA.

>
There are also PL-516, PL-11, ...

>
PL.8

>
And on the operating system side, I know of
OS/2, OS/3, OS/4, OS/7, and OS/9.
>

 OS1100 bzw. OS2200.