Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN-like languages
De : nikke.karlsson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Niklas Karlsson)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscSuivi-à : alt.folklore.computersDate : 28. Sep 2024, 22:44:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Department of Redundancy Department
Message-ID : <llrbm5Fnip4U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.folklore.computers.]
On 2024-09-28, geodandw <
geodandw@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/28/24 17:20, John Levine wrote:
C was in the sweet spot of being not all that great, but better than
any of the plausible alternatives at the time.
If you like getting security exploits due to buffer overruns.
Technically there's nothing stopping you from implementing, say,
Pascal-style strings in C. Of course, that doesn't save you from
null-terminated strings being used in other code you depend on.
Niklas
-- I've always wondered why there's not a Chlamydia Quilt, a Walk for
Gonorrhoea or a Syphilis Ribbon.
It's the idea of a Dash for Incontinence that worries me more. -- Robert Uhl and Tanuki in asr -- Cesium is also liquid just slightly above room temperature, but it explodes oncontact with moisture, which is inconvenient. -- http://www.theodoregray.com/PeriodicTable/Elements/080/index.html