Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : commodorejohn (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John Ames)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 01. Oct 2024, 15:54:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20241001075413.00004624@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 00:56:56 -0400
"
186282@ud0s4.net" <
186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
"AI" might come to the rescue here ... systems tuned to properly
understand old code (and their original hardware) and re-write in
something newer (if not greater).
"AI" (by the current definition of "a probabilistic word-salad
generator we're all pretending is 'intelligent,'" anyway) will never
understand this stuff better than even an incompetent human, because
"AI" doesn't *understand* anything at all. If COBOL programs were
*literally* nothing but the empty boilerplate they appear to be, "AI"
might be useful in maintaining them, but if we assume that they
actually do serve a meaningful function, it will be just as useless as
it is at everything else.
If we want a verbose know-nothing capable of being confidently wrong,
we've already *got* humans. And management.