Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : peter_flass (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Peter Flass)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 01. Oct 2024, 23:39:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1204814977.749513728.490079.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
Waldek Hebisch <
antispam@fricas.org> wrote:
In alt.folklore.computers 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
Final note, FORTRAN is *still* good for most
uses. It's fairly clear, un-fancy, and well-tuned
and people added enough to it over the years so
there's hardly any task you can't do with it.
Still didn't find a native FORTRAN compiler for
modern Linux though ...
gfortran ???
i used fortran the other day - the first fortran I’ve written in decades.
It wasn’t much of a program, I just wanted to see how fortran evaluated
some function or other. It showed me how much I’d forgotten, but also how
much I remembered, like riding a bicycle.
-- Pete