Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 03. Oct 2024, 22:52:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdn3n1$3ssv4$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:58:35 +0100, Pancho wrote:

Deep down, I don't really care about enums. They are nice to have,
intellisense mainly, but I don't want to spend time thinking about them.

Ah, I wondered. So you depend on your IDE’s autocomplete to do at least
some of your thinking for you? That might explain your attitude to coding.

Enums have a great many uses. You know about bit masks? I use enums here
<https://gitlab.com/ldo/inotipy> to give them symbolic names (easier for
the user to understand) that can be used in a set that encodes to the mask
(because that’s what the underlying C API expects), and conversely the
enum provides a classmethod that can decode the low-level mask back to a
set of symbolic names, for easier display for debugging.

It’s all about using the language tools available to make things easier
for yourself.

“Interfaces” are just “abstract base classes lite”. They are a way to
provide a very limited form of multiple inheritance, in the hope that
this would somehow avoid the bewilderment that comes from multiple
inheritance as done in C++.
 
"Pure virtual classes" rather than abstract.

Only C++ uses the term “virtual” in that sense. Proper OO languages don’t.

There is a trade off between a software language being simple, and being
able to neatly solve all problems.

Some languages manage to be simpler, and yet more powerful, than others.
Compare Python to Java or C++, for example.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Sep 24 * Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]72186282@ud0s4.net
29 Sep 24 +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]70The Natural Philosopher
29 Sep 24 i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]68Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Sep 24 ii+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]6Lars Poulsen
29 Sep 24 iii+- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lars Poulsen
30 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Procedural, Functional, String [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 iii `* Re: Procedural, Functional, String [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Lars Poulsen
30 Sep 24 iii  +- Re: Procedural, Functional, String [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Peter Dean
30 Sep 24 iii  `- Re: Procedural, Functional, String [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Dennis Boone
29 Sep 24 ii+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]30rbowman
30 Sep 24 iii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]29Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 iii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]28Pancho
30 Sep 24 iii  `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 iii   +- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 iii   `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]25Pancho
1 Oct 24 iii    +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]20The Natural Philosopher
1 Oct 24 iii    i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24 iii    ii+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3rbowman
3 Oct 24 iii    iii`* C operator precedence rules2Stefan Ram
3 Oct 24 iii    iii `- Re: C operator precedence rules1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 iii    ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]4Peter Flass
4 Oct 24 iii    ii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Bob Eager
4 Oct 24 iii    ii  `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2The Natural Philosopher
4 Oct 24 iii    ii   `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 iii    i+- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 iii    i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]6Peter Flass
2 Oct 24 iii    ii+- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1The Natural Philosopher
2 Oct 24 iii    ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]4The Natural Philosopher
2 Oct 24 iii    ii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Rich Alderson
3 Oct 24 iii    ii  +- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1The Natural Philosopher
3 Oct 24 iii    ii  `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Stefan Ram
2 Oct 24 iii    i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3The Natural Philosopher
3 Oct 24 iii    ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2Peter Flass
3 Oct 24 iii    ii `- Re: Recursion [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24 iii    i`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Pancho
1 Oct 24 iii    `* Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24 iii     `* Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Pancho
3 Oct 24 iii      `* Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 iii       `- Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1rbowman
30 Sep 24 ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]31John Ames
30 Sep 24 ii +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]27Stefan Ram
30 Sep 24 ii i`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]26John Ames
30 Sep 24 ii i +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]22Stefan Ram
1 Oct 24 ii i i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]20John Ames
1 Oct 24 ii i ii+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Stefan Ram
1 Oct 24 ii i iii+- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1John Ames
3 Oct 24 ii i iii`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Waldek Hebisch
1 Oct 24 ii i ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]16The Natural Philosopher
1 Oct 24 ii i ii +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2John Ames
1 Oct 24 ii i ii i`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1The Natural Philosopher
1 Oct 24 ii i ii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 ii i ii  `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]12John Ames
1 Oct 24 ii i ii   `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Oct 24 ii i ii    `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]10John Ames
2 Oct 24 ii i ii     `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Oct 24 ii i ii      `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]8186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 ii i ii       `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]7John Ames
23 Oct 24 ii i ii        `* Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Oct 24 ii i ii         +- Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation1John Ames
24 Oct 24 ii i ii         `* Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation4186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 ii i ii          `* Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation3186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 ii i ii           `* Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation2The Natural Philosopher
25 Oct 24 ii i ii            `- Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation1186282@ud0s4.net
1 Oct 24 ii i i`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Mike Spencer
30 Sep 24 ii i `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii i  `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2John Ames
1 Oct 24 ii i   `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 ii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3rbowman
1 Oct 24 ii  +- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1John Ames
30 Sep 24 i`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Pancho
30 Sep 24 `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1moi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal