Sujet : Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 04. Oct 2024, 04:46:15
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lm96o7Fr43iU2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:52:34 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Some languages manage to be simpler, and yet more powerful, than others.
Compare Python to Java or C++, for example.
Shall we talk about speed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS_BM-bJndsSpoiler alert: MicroPython wins for ease of use and rapid development.
However if you want microsecond granularity, clean PWM control, robust
interrupt handling, and other things that may be important in a
microprocessor project, go for C++.
The same applies to standard Python and C/C++. Python has seen speed
improvements in recent years. I don't know how much 3.13 will add when it
hits the streets. I really enjoy Python but I also know its limitations.
It's back to having a variety of tools in the toolbox and knowing when to
use each one.
As far as code completion and so forth I use VS Code with PyLance and
IntellicCode
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/python/announcing-pylance-fast-feature-rich-language-support-for-python-in-visual-studio-code/
It's another tool.