Re: stacks are not hard, The joy of FORTRAN-like languages

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: stacks are not hard, The joy of FORTRAN-like languages
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 04. Oct 2024, 04:51:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdnoon$3eq3$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 03:49:53 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:

I hear that Algol F did GETMAIN/FREEMAIN at every block or procedure
entry and exit.  Someone at Princeton hacked it to suballocate from
larger chunks and vastly improved runtime performance.

Soon after dynamic memory allocation was invented, it was discovered that
keeping lookaside lists of free blocks in common sizes speeded up
allocations immensely.

This was all well-known by about the 1980s, if not before.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Sep 24 * Re: The joy of FORTRAN-like languages10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN-like languages2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 i`- Re: The joy of FORTRAN-like languages1Peter Flass
30 Sep 24 +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN-like languages2The Natural Philosopher
30 Sep 24 i`- Re: The joy of ALGOL-like languages1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN-like languages5Peter Flass
1 Oct 24  +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN-like languages1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24  `* Re: stacks are not hard, The joy of FORTRAN-like languages3John Levine
4 Oct 24   `* Re: stacks are not hard, The joy of FORTRAN-like languages2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Oct 24    `- Re: stacks are not hard, The joy of FORTRAN-like languages1Lynn Wheeler

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal