Sujet : Re: Alternative to Optical Storage????
De : ant (at) *nospam* zimage.comANT (Ant)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 04. Oct 2024, 06:05:44
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <bbacnSZt_NM16mL7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.10.7-100.fc39.x86_64 (x86_64))
Lars Poulsen <
lars@beagle-ears.com> wrote:
On 30/09/2024 22:35, Ant wrote:
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote at 00:15 this Monday (GMT):
Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> wrote:
On 28/09/2024 16:14, Ant wrote:
In comp.os.linux.misc Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> wrote:
+1 for M-Disc BDR. I use the 100GB version.
>
Aren't they slow? Burning DVDs and CDs take forever! :(
>
Yeah, my 60 GB weekly backup set takes about 3 hours to get on disc.
DVDs are nothing compared to that.
That is burning 55GB to a 100GB-capable BD-R/M-disc, using USB-3 to an
external Pioneer M-Disc compatible BD-R drive.
Oof. Even copying files with USB between HDDs is slow enough for me. Haha.
Might be a issue with your computer? That's weird.
Like overnight, I copied 455 GB that took about 1.5 hrs. ;P
From what media to what media?
Using what data path?
Internal SATA 7200 RPM 2 GB HDD to external 2.5" 5 TB USB3 HDDs.
-- "In his arrogance the wicked man hunts down the weak, who are caught in the schemes he devises." --Psalm 10:2. Out(r)agey (yay 4 $20 credit), slammy, leaky, sneezy, fixy, crazy, hotty, etc. New bins!Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org. / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )