Sujet : Re: Alternative to Optical Storage????
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 08. Oct 2024, 22:40:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvgb97j.bl7v.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Ant <
ant@zimage.comANT> wrote at 05:05 this Friday (GMT):
Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> wrote:
On 30/09/2024 22:35, Ant wrote:
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote at 00:15 this Monday (GMT):
Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> wrote:
On 28/09/2024 16:14, Ant wrote:
In comp.os.linux.misc Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> wrote:
+1 for M-Disc BDR. I use the 100GB version.
>
Aren't they slow? Burning DVDs and CDs take forever! :(
>
Yeah, my 60 GB weekly backup set takes about 3 hours to get on disc.
DVDs are nothing compared to that.
>
That is burning 55GB to a 100GB-capable BD-R/M-disc, using USB-3 to an
external Pioneer M-Disc compatible BD-R drive.
Oof. Even copying files with USB between HDDs is slow enough for me. Haha.
Might be a issue with your computer? That's weird.
Like overnight, I copied 455 GB that took about 1.5 hrs. ;P
>
From what media to what media?
>
Using what data path?
>
Internal SATA 7200 RPM 2 GB HDD to external 2.5" 5 TB USB3 HDDs.
Oh cool
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage????
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage????