Sujet : Re: The Tragedy Of systemd
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 09. Oct 2024, 00:07:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ve4dvp$2blnu$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:48:47 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
It is like a lot of software, ill thought out and ill advised and only
there to stroke the ego of programmers.
For a fast and efficient boot-up two things are crucial:
To start less.
And to start more in parallel.
...
An init system that is responsible for maintaining services
needs to listen to hardware and software changes.
...
[I]s this kind of logic new? No, it certainly is not. The
most prominent system that works like this is Apple’s
launchd system ...
-- Lennart Poettering, “Rethinking PID 1”
<
http://0pointer.net/blog/projects/systemd.html>
The Tragedy Of systemd
Re: The Tragedy Of systemd