Sujet : Re: Alternative to Optical Storage????
De : lars (at) *nospam* cleo.beagle-ears.com (Lars Poulsen)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 09. Oct 2024, 00:22:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrnvgbfl1.2m6r1.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Some time ago, Lars Poulsen wrote:
Yeah, my 60 GB weekly backup set takes about 3 hours to get on disc.
DVDs are nothing compared to that.
That is burning 55GB to a 100GB-capable BD-R/M-disc, using USB-3 to an
external Pioneer M-Disc compatible BD-R drive.
candycanearter07 <
candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
Might be a issue with your computer? That's weird.
On 30/09/2024 22:35, Ant wrote:
Like overnight, I copied 455 GB that took about 1.5 hrs. ;P
Lars Poulsen <
lars@beagle-ears.com> wrote:
From what media to what media?
Using what data path?
Ant <
ant@zimage.comANT> wrote at 05:05 this Friday (GMT):
Internal SATA 7200 RPM 2 GB HDD to external 2.5" 5 TB USB3 HDDs.
I am not surprised that a BD-R drive is slower than a HDD.