Sujet : Re: The Tragedy Of systemd
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 09. Oct 2024, 05:53:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ve528p$2hp4g$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:45:37 -0400, Phillip Frabott wrote:
A lot of times the anti-systemd crowd say that Systemd violates the Unix
philosophy.
“There’s a lot of suggestions that it violates the Unix
philosophy, which I usually take to mean that you want to write
software that does one thing and does it well and then connect it
to other things. systemd as a project contains a lot of things.
systemd as a daemon is a thing that reacts to events and starts
things and does it very well. And so you could claim that it does
not actually violate the unix philosophy. You could claim that
there’s a bit of violation in that it’s bringing all of this extra
functionality into the project; but I think for BSD projects to
criticize another project for bringing a bunch of
tangentially-linked software into one repository to manage it
collectively ... that’s a bit rich.”
-- Benno Rice, “The Tragedy Of systemd”