Sujet : Re: The Tragedy Of systemd
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Richard Kettlewell)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 09. Oct 2024, 11:36:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : terraraq NNTP server
Message-ID : <wwv8quxpnp3.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Marc Haber <mh+
usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> writes:
Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> wrote:
But redhat has funding from and obligations to groups that run large
datacenters that need to be managed from control desks based on
parameterized templates, and to support these needs, they built
something that works for that crowd.
>
And still those server people complain that systemd feels more like
its geared for desktop machines. Noone cares how long it takes to boot
a server,
??? the end users of whatever service the server is providing are likely
to care. Certainly if one of our dev servers (e.g. git, wiki, bug
tracker) has to be rebooted in the middle of the the day[1] then work
will gradually grind to a halt until it’s back.
[1] avoided if possible of course, but sometimes shit happens.
and many server jockeys would love the possibility to turn
off the parallelism of systemd when booting (for reproducibility,
sacrificing speed).
-- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/