Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 16. Oct 2024, 07:54:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <TmudnQycjs2Q_pL6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 10/15/24 7:03 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/10/2024 07:31, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 10/14/24 6:16 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
 
I think that even if it does not work successfully it is great that people are thinking outside the box.
Analogue computers could offer massive parallelism for simulating complex dynamic systems.
>
>
   Yea, but not much PRECISION beyond a stage or two
   of calx  :-)
>
   No "perfect" fixes.
 As I said, let's say we are simulating airflow over  a fast moving object - now normally the fluid dynamics CFM is crap and it is cheaper and more accurate to throw it in a wind tunnel.
   Very likely ... though I've never thrown anything into
   a wind tunnel.
   Analog still has a place. Until you go atomic it really
   is a very analog universe.
   In theory you can do "digitized analog" ... signal
   levels that seem/act analog but are really finely
   discrete digital values. This CAN minimize the
   chain-calc accuracy problem.

The wind tunnel is not measuiring data to any high accuracy but its using atomic level measurement cells in enormous quantities in parallel.
 The problem with CFM is you cant have too may 'cells' or you run out of computer power. Its a step beyond 3D modelling where the more triangles you have the closer to real everything looks, but its a similar problem .
 But a wind tunnel built out of analogue 'cells' might be quite simple in concept. Just large in silicon scale.
 And it wouldn't need to be 'programmed' as its internal logic would be constructed to be the equations that govern fluid dynamics. All you would then do is take a 3D surface and constrain every cell in that computer on that surface to have zero output.
 If I were a graduate again that's a PhD project that would appeal...
   I've seen old analog computers - mostly aimed at finding
   spring rates and such. Rs, caps, inductors ... you can
   sim a somewhat complex mechanical system just by plugging
   in modules. Real-time and adequately accurate. You can
   fake it in digital now however ... but it's not as
   beautiful/natural.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Oct 24 * Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints36186282@ud0s4.net
13 Oct 24 +* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints12Richard Kettlewell
13 Oct 24 i+* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints8The Natural Philosopher
13 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints7Pancho
14 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints6The Natural Philosopher
14 Oct 24 ii  +* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints2Computer Nerd Kev
14 Oct 24 ii  i`- Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints1The Natural Philosopher
15 Oct 24 ii  `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints3186282@ud0s4.net
15 Oct 24 ii   `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints2The Natural Philosopher
16 Oct 24 ii    `- Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints1186282@ud0s4.net
15 Oct 24 i`* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints3186282@ud0s4.net
15 Oct 24 i +- Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints1Mike Scott
15 Oct 24 i `- Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints1Richard Kettlewell
13 Oct 24 `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints23Pancho
15 Oct 24  `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints22186282@ud0s4.net
15 Oct 24   +* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints9The Natural Philosopher
16 Oct 24   i`* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints8186282@ud0s4.net
16 Oct 24   i +- Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints1Pancho
16 Oct 24   i `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints6Richard Kettlewell
18 Oct 24   i  `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints5186282@ud0s4.net
18 Oct 24   i   `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints4Richard Kettlewell
18 Oct 24   i    `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints3186282ud0s3
18 Oct 24   i     `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints2Chris Ahlstrom
18 Oct 24   i      `- Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints1The Natural Philosopher
15 Oct 24   `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints12rbowman
15 Oct 24    `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints11Chris Ahlstrom
16 Oct 24     `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints10rbowman
16 Oct 24      `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints9186282@ud0s4.net
16 Oct 24       `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints8Chris Ahlstrom
16 Oct 24        +* Less politics, more Linux! (was: Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints)3vallor
16 Oct 24        i`* Re: Less politics, more Linux!2Chris Ahlstrom
16 Oct 24        i `- Re: Less politics, more Linux!1vallor
16 Oct 24        +- Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints1The Natural Philosopher
16 Oct 24        `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints3rbowman
17 Oct 24         `* Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints2Chris Ahlstrom
17 Oct 24          `- Re: Well DUH ! AI People Finally Realize They Can Ditch Most Floating-Point for Big Ints1The Natural Philosopher

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal