Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTH (not)
De : peter_flass (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Peter Flass)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 23. Oct 2024, 00:07:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <299011000.751331039.035254.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:59:31 -0700, John Ames wrote:
Which, sure, beefy microcontrollers with comparatively spacious memory
loadouts are cheaper than ever, but less luxurious ones are cheaper
still - and a byte saved is, as always, a byte earned ;)
How much of your time did it take to save that byte?
Think of how many bytes you would need to save per hour of your time, to
make it worthwhile to whoever is paying for that time.
If it’s the difference between using what you have and buying a more
expensive board, times however-many units you’re shipping, it might not be
too many.
-- Pete