Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 24. Oct 2024, 23:19:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfeh5a$2qk0v$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 18:48:57 +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
>
Weak cryptography is easy to fix. The hard part to fix is weak random
numbers.
 
Other way round. A bad RNG can be swapped out for a better one with
little or no impact on anything else.

Unfortunately, you can never be sure your RNG is good.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Oct 24 * Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security108Lester Thorpe
22 Oct 24 +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security9John McCue
22 Oct 24 i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1The Natural Philosopher
22 Oct 24 i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security7bad sector
23 Oct 24 i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Phillip Frabott
23 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
23 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1John McCue
23 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Steve Hayes
25 Oct 24 i   `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Rich
23 Oct 24 +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security92186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security87Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security83Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 iii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security82Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 iii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security81Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security78candycanearter07
25 Oct 24 iii  i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
25 Oct 24 iii  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security76Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security75John Ames
26 Oct 24 iii  i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security17candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i iii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security7rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Pancho
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security56The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security55Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i    `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security54rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .26Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .25186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .23The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).9The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: We're in the middle, always.3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii+- Re: Who you are, where you are, when you are.1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: We're in the middle, always.1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).2rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i `* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).2Don_from_AZ
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i  `- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .13D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .7186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i     `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .7The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2186282@ud0s4.net
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5Physfitfreak
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i      `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i       `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Richard Kettlewell
27 Oct 24 iii   `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Phillip Frabott
25 Oct 24 ii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lester Thorpe
24 Oct 24 +* Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security)3Shadow
25 Oct 24 +- Migrant1Steve Hayes
26 Oct 24 +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lars Poulsen
29 Oct 24 `- Bethlehem; [was Re: Left vs Wrong]1Robert Riches

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal