Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 28. Oct 2024, 22:20:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfov6o$1635o$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:39:12 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

The one irrefutable fact is that there are, with this exception, no
irrefutable facts.

So there is supposedly only one exception? But that is also, by your
argument, an irrefutable fact, is it not?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Oct 24 * Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security108Lester Thorpe
22 Oct 24 +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security9John McCue
22 Oct 24 i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1The Natural Philosopher
22 Oct 24 i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security7bad sector
23 Oct 24 i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Phillip Frabott
23 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
23 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1John McCue
23 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Steve Hayes
25 Oct 24 i   `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Rich
23 Oct 24 +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security92186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security87Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security83Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 iii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security82Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 iii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security81Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security78candycanearter07
25 Oct 24 iii  i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
25 Oct 24 iii  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security76Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security75John Ames
26 Oct 24 iii  i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security17candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i iii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security7rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Pancho
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security56The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security55Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i    `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security54rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .26Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .25186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .23The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).9The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: We're in the middle, always.3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii+- Re: Who you are, where you are, when you are.1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: We're in the middle, always.1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).2rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i `* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).2Don_from_AZ
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i  `- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .13D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .7186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i     `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .7The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2186282@ud0s4.net
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5Physfitfreak
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i      `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i       `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Richard Kettlewell
27 Oct 24 iii   `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Phillip Frabott
25 Oct 24 ii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lester Thorpe
24 Oct 24 +* Re: {OT} was...Re: Left vs Wrong (was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security)3Shadow
25 Oct 24 +- Migrant1Steve Hayes
26 Oct 24 +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lars Poulsen
29 Oct 24 `- Bethlehem; [was Re: Left vs Wrong]1Robert Riches

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal