Sujet : Re: The joy of actual numbers, was Democracy
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 30. Oct 2024, 21:58:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfu6l3$2abbt$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:48:51 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
The point of the article wasn't the peak output, but that we can't
increase total insolation, or the total volume of water flowing in the
river - both of which are needed by a policy of unlimited growth.
So we look for alternative energy sources, and alternative sources of
fresh water. Like the fact that rivers do not retain all the fresh water
that falls from the sky. And that we can build our own water-freshening
systems.
So my moral still stands: beware of folksy, misleading epithets from the
anti-scientists. Or maybe not anti-science as such, just science-ignorant.