Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024, rbowman wrote:
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 11:44:25 +0100, D wrote:
>On Sat, 2 Nov 2024, rbowman wrote:>
>On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:30:39 +0100, D wrote:>
>During the late 18th and early 19th centuries, there was a>
significant demand for labor in plantations across the Americas and
on islands such as Mauritius and Réunion. This demand fueled a slave
trade that affected many African communities. While much of this
trade involved individuals from coastal regions or areas further
north, it also extended into southern Africa.
With a whole continent full of indigenous labor they imported
Africans.
The truth is while the Cherokee didn't have a problem enslaving
people from other tribes they saw the value of buying Africans
instead. When they headed to Oklahoma on the Trail of Tears they took
their African slaves with them.
Really? So indians bought negro slaves? Had no idea! In europe,
indians can do no wrong, and their history is held up as a paragon of
eco-friendly and just, which was crushed by the bad white man.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1842_Slave_Revolt_in_the_Cherokee_Nation
>
That's still having repercussions.
>
https://www.npr.org/2011/09/20/140630565/americas-2nd-largest-indian-
tribe-expels-blacks
Amazing! That would never slip past swedish censorship!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.