Re: The joy of SQL

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: The joy of SQL
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 04. Nov 2024, 02:36:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <SIWdnVp4xI2DuLX6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 11/3/24 6:30 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 21:48:47 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
 
MV = Multi-Valued = Data fields that can hold long lists of that KIND
of information. If you have a fleet-tracking DB then there'd be ONE
field saying "mileage" and likely another for "fuel-added" and they'd
just be added-to over time.
 That’s just a single total in each field.
   It's every like-value in one field - a 'list' so
   to speak - divided as sub-values - but sub-sub-
   values are also legit.

The record for that vehicle is read all-at-once, rather than there
being dozens, hundreds, of records for said vehicle every time it
was fueled-up.
 This is why you have joins: so that you can retrieve multiple related
records with a single query. This is the proper relational way of doing
it.
   Why join when the MV approach keeps yer data
   in an already-joined state ???
   You just read straight across. The RECORD is
   "Vehicle_Number". Inside we have lists (fields)
   for date, mileage, fuel, comment. Date[1] goes
   with Mileage[1] goes with Fuel[1] goes with
   Comment[1]. If you want fuel mileage you add
   a calc field.
   Python, and to some extent FORTRAN, have very good
   string list-manipulation/reading/writing/insertion/deletion
   capabilities ... it'd be fairly easy to set up a MV DB in
   those languages.
   The old PICK-ish DB I spent a decade with used pure
   ASCII-delimited fields (this was pre-unicode, you
   could bring 'em up in a text editor and see all the
   old IBM-BIOS high-ascii symbols).
   255 separated records, 254 separated fields, 253 separated
   sub-fields, 252 sub-sub-fields and so forth - thus you
   could have nearly 200 sub-sub-sub-sub-(etc)-values to
   the data if you were that insane. Going deep programmatically
   for custom sorts and such could be useful however.
   I think PICK wound up being written *in* PICK for the most
   part... a compiler for a sort of BASIC was included so
   PICK would up being writ in PICK-BASIC. The version I
   used DID have some key functions writ in 'C'/ASM though
   for top speed.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Oct 24 * Re: The joy of FORTRAN233186282@ud0s4.net
4 Oct 24 +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN231Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN230186282@ud0s4.net
4 Oct 24 i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN227Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN226rbowman
4 Oct 24 i i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN225Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN219rbowman
5 Oct 24 i i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN218Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Oct 24 i i  i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN217186282@ud0s4.net
6 Oct 24 i i  i  +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24 i i  i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN214rbowman
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN213186282@ud0s4.net
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i +* Re: The joy of FORTH211Peter Dean
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i i+* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i ii`- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Peter Dean
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)208Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)207rbowman
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)199Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)198rbowman
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)197Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)196John Ames
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i   `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)195Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)187John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)186Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)185rbowman
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)184Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2rbowman
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   i`- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)181John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i    `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)180Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)151John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)150Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)149John Ames
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)147magardner2010
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  i+* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)144Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)143magardner2010
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)142Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)139186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i`* Re: The joy of Ada138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i `* Re: The joy of Ada137186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i  `* Re: The joy of Ada136Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i   `* Re: The joy of Ada135186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    +* Re: The joy of Ada132rbowman
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i+* Re: The joy of SQL19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii`* Re: The joy of SQL18186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii +* Re: The joy of SQL4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i`* Re: The joy of SQL3rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i `* Re: The joy of SQL2Peter Dean
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1Peter Dean
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii +* Re: The joy of SQL5rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i+- Re: The joy of SQL1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i`* Re: The joy of SQL3John Ames
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i `* Re: The joy of SQL2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1Kerr-Mudd, John
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii `* Re: The joy of SQL8The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii  `* Re: The joy of SQL7Lars Poulsen
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   +* Re: The joy of SQL4Waldek Hebisch
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i`* Re: The joy of SQL3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i `* Re: The joy of SQL2rbowman
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1John Levine
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   `* Re: The joy of SQL2The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii    `- Re: The joy of SQL1rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i+- Re: The joy of Ada1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i`* Re: The joy of Ada111The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i +- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i `* Re: The joy of Ada109The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i  +- Re: The joy of Ada1rbowman
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i  `* Re: The joy of Ada107Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i   `* Re: The joy of Ada106186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i    `* Re: The joy of Ada105Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     +* Re: The joy of Linux80Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     i+* Re: The joy of Linux78Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii+* Re: The joy of Linux3rbowman
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     iii`* Re: The joy of Linux2186282@ud0s4.net
31 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     iii `- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii`* Re: The joy of Linux74Lars Poulsen
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii +- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii `* Re: The joy of Linux72The Natural Philosopher
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  +* Re: The joy of Linux3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  i`* Re: The joy of Linux2186282@ud0s4.net
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  i `- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  `* Re: The joy of Linux68John Ames
5 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii   `* Re: The joy of Linux67The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii    `* Re: The joy of Linux66186282@ud0s4.net
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     +* Re: The joy of Linux27The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     i+* Re: The joy of Linux25rbowman
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii+* Re: The joy of Linux9The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii+* Re: The joy of Linux6rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii`* Re: The joy of Linux5The Natural Philosopher
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii `* OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]4Robert Riches
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii  `* Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]3The Natural Philosopher
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii   `* Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]2Rich
9 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii    `- Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]1The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii`* Re: The joy of Linux2D
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii `- Re: The joy of Linux1The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii`* Re: The joy of Linux15D
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii +* Re: The joy of Linux2Chris Ahlstrom
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i`- Re: The joy of Linux1The Natural Philosopher
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii +* Re: The joy of Linux9rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i`* Re: The joy of Linux8The Natural Philosopher
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i `* Re: The joy of Linux7rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii `* Re: The joy of Linux3The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     i`- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     `* Re: The joy of Linux38Rich
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     i`- Re: The joy of Linux1186282@ud0s4.net
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     +- Re: The joy of Ada1186282@ud0s4.net
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     `* Re: The joy of Ada23186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    `* Re: The joy of Ada2186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  `* Re: The joy of strong typing2magardner2010
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2Peter Flass
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  `- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Jim Jackson
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)28Peter Flass
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    +- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1rbowman
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)6Waldek Hebisch
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  +- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Peter Dean
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)6Marc Olschok
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
7 Oct 24 i i  i  `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
5 Oct 24 i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Richard Kettlewell
4 Oct 24 i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
4 Oct 24 `- Re: python abstractions, The joy of FORTRAN1John Levine

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal