Re: The joy of SQL

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: The joy of SQL
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 05. Nov 2024, 07:54:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <pJScnYa_tafcXLT6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 11/4/24 5:09 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:36:29 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
 
On 11/3/24 6:30 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 21:48:47 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>
MV = Multi-Valued = Data fields that can hold long lists of that KIND
of information. If you have a fleet-tracking DB then there'd be ONE
field saying "mileage" and likely another for "fuel-added" and they'd
just be added-to over time.
>
The record for that vehicle is read all-at-once, rather than there
being dozens, hundreds, of records for said vehicle every time it was
fueled-up.
>
This is why you have joins: so that you can retrieve multiple related
records with a single query. This is the proper relational way of doing
it.
>
Why join when the MV approach keeps yer data in an already-joined
state ???
 Because the MV approach makes that hard to maintain.
   Never noticed that ...
   Everything always in nice structure/order and
   all-together. Nirvana.

Python, and to some extent FORTRAN, have very good string
list-manipulation/reading/writing/insertion/deletion capabilities ...
it'd be fairly easy to set up a MV DB in those languages.
 Python is quite good at SQL database manipulations. This include
setting up complicated joins.
   But why would you want to use SQL ? Insane  :-)

I have some basic tutorials here
<https://gitlab.com/ldo/python_topics_notebooks/-/blob/master/Databases,%20Iterators%20&%20Looping.ipynb?ref_type=heads>
 
The old PICK-ish DB I spent a decade with used pure ASCII-delimited
fields (this was pre-unicode, you could bring 'em up in a text editor
and see all the old IBM-BIOS high-ascii symbols).
 I know, it was crap. Probably scarred you for life, which is why you
think the way you do.
   LOVED those little IBM chars. That they buried them SO
   deep in the unicode codex suggests deliberate bias.
   Anyway, clearly, our religions are never gonna be
   in-sync here.
   You CAN download OpenQM if you want, see how the MV
   approach can be useful. Having used both, and seeing
   flat-file forced down everyone's throats, I'm gonna
   stick with my belief MV has a slight edge and is
   more sane and 'organic'.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Oct 24 * Re: The joy of FORTRAN233186282@ud0s4.net
4 Oct 24 +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN231Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN230186282@ud0s4.net
4 Oct 24 i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN227Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN226rbowman
4 Oct 24 i i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN225Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN219rbowman
5 Oct 24 i i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN218Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Oct 24 i i  i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN217186282@ud0s4.net
6 Oct 24 i i  i  +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24 i i  i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN214rbowman
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN213186282@ud0s4.net
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i +* Re: The joy of FORTH211Peter Dean
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i i+* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i ii`- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Peter Dean
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)208Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)207rbowman
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)199Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)198rbowman
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)197Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)196John Ames
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i   `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)195Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)187John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)186Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)185rbowman
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)184Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2rbowman
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   i`- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)181John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i    `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)180Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)151John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)150Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)149John Ames
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)147magardner2010
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  i+* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)144Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)143magardner2010
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)142Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)139186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i`* Re: The joy of Ada138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i `* Re: The joy of Ada137186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i  `* Re: The joy of Ada136Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i   `* Re: The joy of Ada135186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    +* Re: The joy of Ada132rbowman
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i+* Re: The joy of SQL19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii`* Re: The joy of SQL18186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii +* Re: The joy of SQL4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i`* Re: The joy of SQL3rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i `* Re: The joy of SQL2Peter Dean
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1Peter Dean
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii +* Re: The joy of SQL5rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i+- Re: The joy of SQL1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i`* Re: The joy of SQL3John Ames
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i `* Re: The joy of SQL2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1Kerr-Mudd, John
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii `* Re: The joy of SQL8The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii  `* Re: The joy of SQL7Lars Poulsen
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   +* Re: The joy of SQL4Waldek Hebisch
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i`* Re: The joy of SQL3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i `* Re: The joy of SQL2rbowman
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1John Levine
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   `* Re: The joy of SQL2The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii    `- Re: The joy of SQL1rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i+- Re: The joy of Ada1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i`* Re: The joy of Ada111The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i +- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i `* Re: The joy of Ada109The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i  +- Re: The joy of Ada1rbowman
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i  `* Re: The joy of Ada107Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i   `* Re: The joy of Ada106186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i    `* Re: The joy of Ada105Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     +* Re: The joy of Linux80Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     i+* Re: The joy of Linux78Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii+* Re: The joy of Linux3rbowman
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     iii`* Re: The joy of Linux2186282@ud0s4.net
31 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     iii `- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii`* Re: The joy of Linux74Lars Poulsen
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii +- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii `* Re: The joy of Linux72The Natural Philosopher
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  +* Re: The joy of Linux3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  i`* Re: The joy of Linux2186282@ud0s4.net
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  i `- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  `* Re: The joy of Linux68John Ames
5 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii   `* Re: The joy of Linux67The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii    `* Re: The joy of Linux66186282@ud0s4.net
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     +* Re: The joy of Linux27The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     i+* Re: The joy of Linux25rbowman
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii+* Re: The joy of Linux9The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii+* Re: The joy of Linux6rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii`* Re: The joy of Linux5The Natural Philosopher
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii `* OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]4Robert Riches
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii  `* Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]3The Natural Philosopher
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii   `* Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]2Rich
9 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii    `- Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]1The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii`* Re: The joy of Linux2D
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii `- Re: The joy of Linux1The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii`* Re: The joy of Linux15D
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii +* Re: The joy of Linux2Chris Ahlstrom
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i`- Re: The joy of Linux1The Natural Philosopher
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii +* Re: The joy of Linux9rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i`* Re: The joy of Linux8The Natural Philosopher
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i `* Re: The joy of Linux7rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii `* Re: The joy of Linux3The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     i`- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     `* Re: The joy of Linux38Rich
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     i`- Re: The joy of Linux1186282@ud0s4.net
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     +- Re: The joy of Ada1186282@ud0s4.net
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     `* Re: The joy of Ada23186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    `* Re: The joy of Ada2186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  `* Re: The joy of strong typing2magardner2010
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2Peter Flass
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  `- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Jim Jackson
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)28Peter Flass
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    +- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1rbowman
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)6Waldek Hebisch
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  +- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Peter Dean
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)6Marc Olschok
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
7 Oct 24 i i  i  `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
5 Oct 24 i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Richard Kettlewell
4 Oct 24 i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
4 Oct 24 `- Re: python abstractions, The joy of FORTRAN1John Levine

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal