Re: The joy of Population

On 05/11/2024 01:23, rbowman wrote:

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:52:21 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
 

On 4 Nov 2024 18:27:56 GMT, rbowman wrote:
>

Except for the baby mommas that see kids as a source of income...

>
The Government should be paying women to have children.
>
Where else are the children going to come from?

 Essentially the US government does pay women to have children.
Unfortunately they are the women you wish were sterile.

Mmm. I knew a girl who was basically a part time whore, who had a kid so she could get free housing.
She (married?) a graduate communist, but became totally disillusioned with his greed and materialism, so struck out on her own.
I asked her why he had taken up with him in the first place 'well that was all there was wa'n't it?'
He wanted an authentic 'working class' girl.

They do have a
disproportionate number of abortions so that might be a plus. Margaret
Sanger focused on contraception until later in her life but she had a
particular interest in that group.

--
Those who want slavery should have the grace to name it by its proper name. They must face the full meaning of that which they are advocating or condoning; the full, exact, specific meaning of collectivism, of its logical implications, of the principles upon which it is based, and of the ultimate consequences to which these principles will lead. They must face it, then decide whether this is what they want or not.
Ayn Rand.