Re: The joy of Linux

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: The joy of Linux
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 15. Nov 2024, 09:04:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <m0-dnebK_6k1nar6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 11/14/24 9:16 AM, Rich wrote:
186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
On 11/13/24 3:57 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 13/11/2024 08:50, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Most 60s cars used
    DRUM brakes, you got maybe two or three good
    apps before they'd fade.
>
The thing about drum brakes is that they have slight but significant
innate brake assistance - the leading shoe tends to wedge itself on.
>
   Yep - likely By Design.
>
   BUT, the instant things get red hot - NO more brakes.
   Modern discs/pads ARE superior.
 Disks are superior, but don't think you can't make them fade with
over-application.  They too will fade if the rotors get hot enough.
The reason why they don't fade as easily is the design provides more
cooling, so it takes more braking application to achieve the same
'fade' level.
   VERY aware of that.
   They DO cool quicker however. BIG advantage.

I don't want to go back to unassisted brakes and no power steering
either.
>
   "Unassisted" CAN be OK ... but it takes a little
   practice.
>
   Had an early-60s car that DID have power steering,
   but I was too broke to replace the pump. THAT built
   up the arm muscles ! 384 replaced with a 426 ...
   massive power, needed a booster fuel pump !
 A proper 'manual steer' car is easier to drive than a power steering
car with the power steering disabled.  The gearing in the steering unit
is set differently for power assist units vs. true manual steer units,
and power assist, without the power assist, is much harder to steer.
   Oh, VERY aware of THAT ... the fucker was insanely
   difficult - took major effort.
   BUT, I could barely afford gas money back then ...

It is the same with power assist brakes.  The hydralic multiplication
factor is different between power assist master cylinders and true
manual cylinders.  The power assist brakes, without the power assist,
will require much more force on the pedal than a 'manual brake' system
requires to produce the same stopping power.
   I'd rather have un-powered steering than faulty
   power brakes. The systems were NOT set up to cope
   with unpowered brakes fer-sure. You'd have to
   weigh 400 pounds to get a good stop.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Oct 24 * Re: The joy of FORTRAN233186282@ud0s4.net
4 Oct 24 +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN231Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN230186282@ud0s4.net
4 Oct 24 i +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN227Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN226rbowman
4 Oct 24 i i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN225Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN219rbowman
5 Oct 24 i i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN218Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Oct 24 i i  i `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN217186282@ud0s4.net
6 Oct 24 i i  i  +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Oct 24 i i  i  +* Re: The joy of FORTRAN214rbowman
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTRAN213186282@ud0s4.net
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i +* Re: The joy of FORTH211Peter Dean
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i i+* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i ii`- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Peter Dean
20 Oct 24 i i  i  i i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)208Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)207rbowman
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)199Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)198rbowman
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)197Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)196John Ames
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i   `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)195Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)187John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)186Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)185rbowman
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)184Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2rbowman
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   i`- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i   `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)181John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i    `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)180Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)151John Ames
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)150Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)149John Ames
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)147magardner2010
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  i+* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)144Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)143magardner2010
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)142Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  +* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)139186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i`* Re: The joy of Ada138Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i `* Re: The joy of Ada137186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i  `* Re: The joy of Ada136Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i   `* Re: The joy of Ada135186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    +* Re: The joy of Ada132rbowman
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i+* Re: The joy of SQL19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii`* Re: The joy of SQL18186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii +* Re: The joy of SQL4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i`* Re: The joy of SQL3rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i `* Re: The joy of SQL2Peter Dean
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1Peter Dean
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii +* Re: The joy of SQL5rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i+- Re: The joy of SQL1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i`* Re: The joy of SQL3John Ames
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i `* Re: The joy of SQL2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1Kerr-Mudd, John
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii `* Re: The joy of SQL8The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii  `* Re: The joy of SQL7Lars Poulsen
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   +* Re: The joy of SQL4Waldek Hebisch
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i`* Re: The joy of SQL3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i `* Re: The joy of SQL2rbowman
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   i  `- Re: The joy of SQL1John Levine
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii   `* Re: The joy of SQL2The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    ii    `- Re: The joy of SQL1rbowman
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i+- Re: The joy of Ada1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i`* Re: The joy of Ada111The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i +- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i `* Re: The joy of Ada109The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i  +- Re: The joy of Ada1rbowman
27 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i  `* Re: The joy of Ada107Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i   `* Re: The joy of Ada106186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i    `* Re: The joy of Ada105Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     +* Re: The joy of Linux80Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     i+* Re: The joy of Linux78Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii+* Re: The joy of Linux3rbowman
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     iii`* Re: The joy of Linux2186282@ud0s4.net
31 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     iii `- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii`* Re: The joy of Linux74Lars Poulsen
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii +- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii `* Re: The joy of Linux72The Natural Philosopher
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  +* Re: The joy of Linux3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  i`* Re: The joy of Linux2186282@ud0s4.net
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  i `- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii  `* Re: The joy of Linux68John Ames
5 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii   `* Re: The joy of Linux67The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii    `* Re: The joy of Linux66186282@ud0s4.net
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     +* Re: The joy of Linux27The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     i+* Re: The joy of Linux25rbowman
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii+* Re: The joy of Linux9The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii+* Re: The joy of Linux6rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii`* Re: The joy of Linux5The Natural Philosopher
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii `* OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]4Robert Riches
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii  `* Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]3The Natural Philosopher
8 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii   `* Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]2Rich
9 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iiii    `- Re: OT: (politics) [was Re: The joy of Linux]1The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii`* Re: The joy of Linux2D
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     iii `- Re: The joy of Linux1The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii`* Re: The joy of Linux15D
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii +* Re: The joy of Linux2Chris Ahlstrom
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i`- Re: The joy of Linux1The Natural Philosopher
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii +* Re: The joy of Linux9rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i`* Re: The joy of Linux8The Natural Philosopher
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii i `* Re: The joy of Linux7rbowman
7 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     ii `* Re: The joy of Linux3The Natural Philosopher
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     i`- Re: The joy of Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Nov 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     ii     `* Re: The joy of Linux38Rich
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     i`- Re: The joy of Linux1186282@ud0s4.net
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     +- Re: The joy of Ada1186282@ud0s4.net
30 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    i     `* Re: The joy of Ada23186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  i    `* Re: The joy of Ada2186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  ii  `* Re: The joy of strong typing2magardner2010
25 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  i`* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)2Peter Flass
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     i  `- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Jim Jackson
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    i     `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)28Peter Flass
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    +- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1rbowman
23 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  i    `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)6Waldek Hebisch
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  +- Re: The joy of FORTH (not)1Peter Dean
24 Oct 24 i i  i  i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTH (not)6Marc Olschok
21 Oct 24 i i  i  i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
7 Oct 24 i i  i  `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1The Natural Philosopher
5 Oct 24 i i  `* Re: The joy of FORTRAN5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 i +- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1Richard Kettlewell
4 Oct 24 i `- Re: The joy of FORTRAN1John Ames
4 Oct 24 `- Re: python abstractions, The joy of FORTRAN1John Levine

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal