Sujet : Re: The joy of octal
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 16. Nov 2024, 09:20:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <kqadnRoGHfV6yKX6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 11/16/24 12:24 AM, rbowman wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:31:26 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Again, not entirely sure where the end of octal was. Many of the PDPs
used octal, and I *think* a few PIC chips. 8/16/32 kinda took over
kinda early on however.
chmod 4755
I don't know if I'd call it octal but if you were writing an assembler for
quite a few microcontrollers the opcodes would have a pattern where source
ans destination registers were 0 - 7,
Octal does persist, sometimes in obscure ways and places.
It WAS kinda big for awhile - a "big step" better than
8-bit.
Alas don't think anymore 12 or 24 bit CPUs are
gonna be made. Might still have a place for some
higher-end microcontrollers - hell, I think Epson
still makes FOUR-bit microcontrollers (looked at
the sheet for one once, insanely capable).
Hmmm ... 256 of those 4-bitters running
parallel - that'd be a fun project :-)