Sujet : Re: Anybody Seen a Simple LED "Fail-Over" Circuit ?
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 27. Nov 2024, 06:20:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <8mSdnRRCUbWkMdv6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 11/26/24 4:00 AM, Bernd Froehlich wrote:
On 26. Nov 2024 at 08:24:12 CET, "186283@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
wrote:
LEDs are great, but never "forever". They DO
fail - but for some safety apps you can't
just HAVE things go black.
Hmm, just a thought:
If I understood the problem correctly, you want the LED to show some
failstate, right?
What if you switch the LED on when everything is fine and off would signal
a fail?
If the LED is off then you know it´s either a fail or the LED is broken.
Either way you have to do something.
The fail state can (usually) be detected just past the
current-limiting resistor. If the voltage there suddenly
equals the supply voltage then the LED is not conducting.
Again though, more electronics.
COULD use that elevated voltage to trip a 'relay' trans
connected to LED-2 however.
For some apps, you may just be able to look and SEE which
LED is illuminated. If you normally light the right-side
one, but peeking in shows the left-side one lit, then
you have a problem.
The original LED traffic lights used a cluster of LEDs,
divided into individually-driven segments. If one failed
then only a segment went dark, but MOST of them would
keep working. It was always the greens that went bad.
TODAY, not sure - I fear they use some more monolithic
device that'll die all at once.