Sujet : Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT
De : robin_listas (at) *nospam* es.invalid (Carlos E.R.)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 27. Nov 2024, 13:33:57
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <l6gj1lx10f.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2024-11-21 20:59, rbowman wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:04:12 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2024-11-21 05:45, rbowman wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 07:35:47 +0800, Woozy Song wrote:
>
1000 watts TDP?
Seems just making more powerful chips by brute force has to end
soon.
>
Faster == hotter. I remember a seminar about 40 years ago when CMOS was
coming into its own and touted as low power. The dirty little secret
was the power required to switch capacitive loads is a function of the
voltage and frequency so the dynamic power dissipation exceeded that of
74LS parts when you drove them hard.
>
Still, they are fantastic for things like a battery powered clock. Or
processors that stay a lot of the time waiting.
Definitely. Like all design decisions they have their place. To really
date myself I sent my Osborne 1 back to the factory for the 100 column and
DS/DD floppy upgrade. The new video would work for a while and then die. I
isolated the problem chip with a can of cooler. It was CMOS and when I
replaced it with the equivalent 74LS problem solved.
That's a curious one. :-)
-- Cheers, Carlos.
Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT
Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT
