Sujet : Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT
De : tnp (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (The Natural Philosopher)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 27. Nov 2024, 13:46:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A little, after lunch
Message-ID : <vi74ak$3vogk$17@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 27/11/2024 12:33, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2024-11-21 20:59, rbowman wrote:
Definitely. Like all design decisions they have their place. To really
date myself I sent my Osborne 1 back to the factory for the 100 column and
DS/DD floppy upgrade. The new video would work for a while and then die. I
isolated the problem chip with a can of cooler. It was CMOS and when I
replaced it with the equivalent 74LS problem solved.
That's a curious one. :-)
Actually it isn't. Ive been peripherally involved with hardware for years, because that was where I started so any hardware problems came my way.
Where I started in military spec hardware we endeavoured to guarantee that if *every single chip* was 'edge of spec' between -40°C and +125°C, the bloody thing still worked.
Imagine my surprise at encountering 'commercial design' where it was sufficient if the thing worked between +10°C and +40°C and the customer did the product testing, in terms of returned items.
But then a PC doesn't cost $25,000 does it?
-- WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education.