Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, Rich wrote:D <nospam@example.net> wrote:On Mon, 9 Dec 2024, Charlie Gibbs wrote:>On 2024-12-08, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:>
>And consider the explosive force stored in a 350-700 bar (your>
AI's number) pressure vessel that becomes brittle enough to go "bang".
That's one hell of a bang, even without the hydrogen itself explosively
combusting as part of the pressure release.
I've seen the results of a 200-bar scuba tank letting go.
And that's just a little 80-cubic foot tank filled with air.
How did this happen? In sweden, there is an epidemic of bombings for the
past couple of years, since crazy drug dealing arabians are waging some
kind of war with hand grenades, and car battery bombs in the bigger
cities.
>
Would using scuba tanks be a cheaper way for them to bomb each other?
Likely not as cheap as a car battery. I see a 2.3L mini scuba tank on
Amazon for $299 (no idea how big a 2.3L mini tank really is). I can
get a car battery for about $100 at the local auto-store.
>
And the scuba tank will not also spray sulfuric acid over everyone when
it goes "bang". And short of an armor peircing slug, it is probably
more difficult to get a new scuba tank to go "bang" vs becoming a brief
high speed rocket or spinner.
>Also, how does a car battery bomb work?>
Perhaps google would answer your question... Or perhaps google would
report you to the authorities for even asking the question?
I did, and my conclusion was that a pipe bombs with gun powder would be
lighter, cheaper and more dangerous.
So that's why I ask you knowledgeable guys, since to me, it seems there
are _way_ better ways to cause mayhem than car battery bombs.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.