Sujet : Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 11. Dec 2024, 07:05:59
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lrsoe6Fac80U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:45:06 -0500,
186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 12/10/24 3:01 AM, rbowman wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 01:54:05 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Ummmmm ... I just TRIED with the "Bit-Slice" topic.
Jumped IMMEDIATELY back to 'non-OS/Computer stuff'
How about that bubble memory?
Fizzy !!! :-)
There may be modern updates - not magnetic bubbles but some kinds of
-ons or -ions. Functional equivs,
flash fakes it, but isn't that robust - and the ferroelectrics are
too low density.
Somehow bit slice abd bubble memories are cataloged side by side in my
brain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_PALM_processorThere is another golden oldie. The 5120 was a strange beast, selectable
for either BASIC or APL. It's successor, the System/23, had an 8085 rather
than IBM's homebrew but had a similar look. Familiarity with the 8085 was
one of the factors for using the 8088.
What i never could figure out is the 5100, 5120, and 5120 were all the
PALM, whue the System/23 went to 53xx. Then they went back to 5150 for the
PC that had absolutely nothing in common with the 5120.