Sujet : Re: The Joy of *small* business
De : tnp (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (The Natural Philosopher)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 22. Dec 2024, 10:53:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A little, after lunch
Message-ID : <vk8nib$ie68$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 22/12/2024 09:31, rbowman wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:12:43 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Those poor people ... caught between an ever-growing mountain of
facts/evidence and equally-persuasive *belief* (which requires no
facts). They TRY to find ways to splice it all together. It doesn't
work well ...
A friend was a Young Earther despite being a proficient programmer. Given
the premise God can do anything it's no problem for him to whip up the
Grand Canyon with all its geological layers in his spare time. He was also
well rehearsed in the creationist arguments against evolution.
The problem is, that both the scientific narrative and the creationist one are complete, logical and unassailable.
One posits a supernatural 'Big Bang' from which time, space energy and the laws of nature miraculously sprang, and the other posits a big Creation from which time, space energy and the laws of nature miraculously sprang, just already formed as a complete *fake*, like someone today constructing a '1000 year old' house. Complete with faked history.
The only difference is the latter big bang has a sentient intelligence with a Plan in charge.
Really we only reject it on the slender basis of Occam - it's simply more complicated than necessary to explain this shit.
-- “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it.”– H. L. Mencken