Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
This is the truth! It almost feels like Moores law kind of. The further we go,Ahh... but let's wait and see...>
"The findings, posted on the preprint server arXiv but not yet published in a
peer-reviewed journal, have attracted both global attention and skepticism".
Oh, I agree there ... but one of the main points was
that the instrumentation/methods were much improved
yet STILL showed the mysterious effect (just in better
detail).
>
So, downstream, I expect this is gonna be deemed REAL.
>
And it's REALLY weird.
>
Seems like every time instrumentation improves by even
2X then The Science has to leap ahead 10X.
Yes.>Better find a way, quick, to push up human IQ intoWhat is IQ? What is intelligence? We are fumbling around in the dark. Is a human
the 500 range, WITHOUT causing insanity.
+ a computer a 200 IQ person? Stanislaw Lem writes in one of his books about
knowledge factories. It was a long time I read it, but it kind of gave me the
impression he is thinking about AI-farms churning out theories and science.
Beyond a certain point nobody is SURE what "IQ" means.
It's kind of the problem where you're trying to describe
yourself - but the very attempt at description ALTERS
the equation. Very quantum :-)
I've met a few people with EXTREME 'IQ' over the years.I imagine that our IQ scales (as bad as they might be) start to break down
One seemed kinda 'normal', but just had kinda superhuman
math abilities/perspective. The other two were, well,
NOT so 'normal' - skittish, borderline autistic,
'borderline' in general.
>
But we're still talking IQ-200 max here. What the hell
would 300 or 500 look like ??? Note effective intellectual
ability is not proportional to the IQ score. 120 is MUCH
more capable than 100.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.