Sujet : Re: For The Word Lovers
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 03. Jan 2025, 12:43:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <310838ca-a332-1a10-d538-b0e74aeb96c6@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025, pH wrote:
On 2025-01-02, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025, pH wrote:
>
On 2025-01-01, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>
https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/23/svardos_drdos_reborn/?td=rt-3a
>
Now's your chance to run Word 6.0.
>
The last Word I liked was Word 95. After that it grew ever more rococo.
>
>
Yeah, LO Writer is my stuff. I have WPS Office installed, too, just
for the hell of it, but I use LO.
>
>
I like the jstar invocation of Joe as I'm a wordstar fan...why would anyone
use anything else?
>
I wonder if there's a way to get LO to use the WS keybindings....
>
I do use LO when needed but Jstar --> enscript --> lpr for most of my
letters.
>
pH
>
>
Doesn't joe have some kind of jmacs as well?
>
from the man page for Joe...
>
joe [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]...
jstar [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]...
jmacs [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]...
rjoe [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]...
jpico [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]...
>
>
So it does a bunch...I think there is actually a WordStar clone for linux
out there but I've never investigated it.
>
I should try 'joe' by itself just to see....
>
>
pH
>
My view is that joe is actually quite capable but lives its own life away from the mainstreet. As you say, maybe I should look into it a bit more.