Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 04. Jan 2025, 07:41:21
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lts3ghFghgcU9@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 01:33:42 +0100, D wrote:
Hallucinations will probably have to be "fixed" by either hiring
africans to double check answers, sorry "fact check", and then store
those so that similar queries are redirected to those canned answers.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/12/journal-editors-resign-to-protest-ai-use-high-fees-and-more/
"In-house production has been reduced or outsourced, and in 2023 Elsevier
began using AI during production without informing the board, resulting in
many style and formatting errors, as well as reversing versions of papers
that had already been accepted and formatted by the editors. “This was
highly embarrassing for the journal and resolution took six months and was
achieved only through the persistent efforts of the editors," the editors
wrote. "AI processing continues to be used and regularly reformats
submitted manuscripts to change meaning and formatting and require
extensive author and editor oversight during proof stage.”
"There is certainly cause for concern when it comes to using AI in the
pursuit of science. For instance, earlier this year, we witnessed the
viral sensation of several egregiously bad AI-generated figures published
in a peer-reviewed article in Frontiers, a reputable scientific journal.
Scientists on social media expressed equal parts shock and ridicule at the
images, one of which featured a rat with grotesquely large and bizarre
genitals. The paper has since been retracted, but the incident reinforces
a growing concern that AI will make published scientific research less
trustworthy, even as it increases productivity."
Somehow a rat with big balls really upset them.