Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 09. Jan 2025, 06:50:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <0YOcnZBugIIU_uL6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 1/8/25 10:34 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 08/01/2025 14:02, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
No, it is not the people who dont want nucler, it is the oil gas and
renewable companies who don't want nuclear, and who spend an enormous
amount of money on negative propaganda and buying politicians and
regulators, who tell you that the people don't want nuclear.
Well, we know that, at some point, oil and gas will become scarce and
expensive.
>
I'm not sure what's in the nuclear objection for "renewables", though.
If you have a nuclear grid there is no point in having any renewable energy whatsoever. It simply adds cost complexity and unreliability for no benefit whatsoever.
Ummmmm ... depends on your goals. Less nuke may also
be a longer-term goal due to waste disposal and safety
issues.
So, to each problem, the best solution - short/medium/long
term.
Renewable companies are only too aware of the fact that widespread adoption of nuclear power means the end of wind and solar.
Not everyone/everything is 'on the grid', at least
not conveniently/economically. I think solar-PV
does have various useful niches. It can also be
a 'back-up' for more remote communities if the
grid segment goes down ... power the most vital
municipal systems - water/sewer, hospitals, comms.
Hey, why do you think UPS units sell so well ? :-)
Perovskite PV cells have been steadily improving -
now pushing into silicon territory. If you need
to replace silicon cells every 20 years that's
a huge expense - but Perovskite is aiming at
ultra-thin films ... something that can come
on a big roll of mylar and even just glued to
support structures. If the 20-year expense is
suddenly like the price of a can of whitewash
then the picture looks MUCH better.
I'd eventually like to see PVs replace almost
all conventional power plants - even nukes.
However I'm well aware that the tech and
expense for the cells - plus storage - are
generally NOT there yet. Until those factors
look much better then PV is more of a 'fetish'.