Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1

On 09/01/2025 17:43, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

On 2025-01-09, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
 

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>

You forget that it is the people who do not want nuclear. It is proven
dangerous.

>
This is factually incorrect. If you cound the nr of dead, coal, hydro and
solar have all killed more people than nuclear.
>
Remember the death count at Fukushima due to radiation... it is firmly at
0.

 Ditto for Three Mile Island, which to this day I take as an example of
how safe nuclear is.  Total meltdown, but no casualties.
 Meanwhile, how many people have been hit by coal trains or died a
slow lingering death from black lung?
 

And in fact a coal power statins load of fly ash - used in the UKs past to make building blocks out of - would be classed as low level waste if it came from a nuclear plant
Quite a lot of uranium and therefore radon and friends in coal
But lets look at US radiation exposure
https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1413/NAMrad_exp_let.gif
The Fukushima clean up aims to get below 20nGy/hr
It would be impossible to achieve in the USA.
--
The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with what it actually is.