What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1)

On 1/11/25 8:21 AM, chrisv wrote:

-hh wrote:
 

(snipped, unread)

 Poor -highhorse.  If he's not attacking reasonable behavior, he's
defending unreasonable behavior.
 I would love to see him "man up" on the censorship issue.

Sure:  it goes back to at least 9 April 2013...
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/1W-mAcPC-B4/m/lsaUt_ozLEwJ>
I had called out COLA's behavior of hypocrisy, where the left side of their piehole was bragging about freedom of speech while the right side of their piehole was trying to exploit peer pressure to supress the voices of posters (yup, censorship) whose messages they disliked.
Naturally, the usual suspects were the ones who were butthurt.

He could
admit that leftists in the government disallowed freedom of speech.

Got cite?  Let's see the Google Groups URL to this alleged post.
Because there were conversations like this one which revealed how Musk has been a hypocrite with twitter, just like COLA boys above:
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/KGUPKGKvT-Y/m/El_VEgicAAAJ>

Government directives resulted in the censorship of those on the
right.  On multiple issues that went against the Biden
administration's narrative.

Again, got cite?  Let's see the Google Groups URL to this alleged post.

This is relevant to what was being discussed, too.  It shows that the
asshole is ok with our most precious rights being taken away.

The only 'relevance' is that you're boundless in your hypocrisies
and always cry victim when you get called out.

He will need to change the subject header to indicate his intentions
to "man up", of course, if I'm to see it.

Well, if that's all it takes to avoid your censorship, and since I'm not changing my position, I've suitably updated the subjectline to tell you and every other COLA hypocrite to go fuck off.
-hh