Sujet : Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?)
De : tnp (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (The Natural Philosopher)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 12. Jan 2025, 21:23:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A little, after lunch
Message-ID : <vm18b9$1da38$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/01/2025 14:52, Lars Poulsen wrote:
On 12/01/2025 13:46, Lars Poulsen wrote:
The one thing I was missing on Pi-4 was a second ethernet port so I
could use it as a firewall/edge router with room for all the monitoring
capabilities I could dream up to implement with PCAP.
>
Dongle-attached extra ethernet ports are a bit unstable in my
experience. Often have spotty Linux driver support, often get
redesigned with a different ethernet chip with no visible/noticeable
change in product name or packaging. Being on an ARM system makes the
problems stemming from this several steps worse.
On 2025-01-12, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Plenty of Pi ethernet hats available...
Yes, but then I'd have to find or make an enclosure that fits the board
SET.
That's what 3D printers are for...:-)
-- There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons that sound good.Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)
GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1