Sujet : Re: smart plugs???
De : rich (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Rich)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc alt.os.linux.mintDate : 16. Jan 2025, 21:05:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmboqk$3l2jo$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
In comp.os.linux.misc Mike Scott <
usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> wrote:
On 15/01/2025 20:31, Pancho wrote:
I think you have to be careful that they are not controlled by a
cloud service. If you have a cloud service you need a working wan
connection and you are exposed to the cloud service provider
disappearing.
(Thanks to all for replying)
This is the rub. tp-link clearly /want/ the consumer to use their
"cloud" service - which is usually just a fancy codeword for 'we want
your data'.
There's no actual /need/ that I can see in this case.
There is no actual /need/, provided the buyer is slightly technically
inclined.
For the 99.1% of their users, who are lost if their icon for FB moves
5mm away from the location it has always been located, it provides a
way for TP-Link to get them setup and working (and working from both
local to their home network and from somewhere remote).
Which would be the reason given if the maker was pushed. Reality is,
they also love the money available from selling the data treasure trove
they can hoover up as well.