Sujet : Re: smart plugs???
De : rich (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Rich)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc alt.os.linux.mintDate : 16. Jan 2025, 21:07:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmboup$3l2jo$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
In comp.os.linux.misc D <
nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 16/01/2025 09:33, Mike Scott wrote:
On 15/01/2025 20:31, Pancho wrote:
I think you have to be careful that they are not controlled by a
cloud service. If you have a cloud service you need a working wan
connection and you are exposed to the cloud service provider
disappearing.
(Thanks to all for replying)
This is the rub. tp-link clearly /want/ the consumer to use their
"cloud" service - which is usually just a fancy codeword for 'we
want your data'. There's no actual /need/ that I can see in this
case.
Actually there is.
>
It is the simple way to solve 'remote access' to your 'behind NAS'
network connected gadgets
>
Now *we* can organise that because we are geeks, but te average
coinsumer? Doan mak me larf!
I use tor to give me a globally unique name where I can access my
stuff behind NAT as a Tor hidden service.
99.1% of the total users would be incapable of achieving what you are
doing with Tor, even if given infinite time to set it all up.